Frando v. Gore et al
Petitioner: Daniel C. Frando
Respondent: Bill Gore and Xavier Becerra
Case Number: 3:2021cv01434
Filed: August 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen S Crawford
Referring Judge: Janis L Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Denying #10 Renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 10/8/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Denying as Moot #8 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/1/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
September 29, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel C. Frando. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/28/2021. (tcf)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford Accepting Document: Motion for Request of Appointment of Counsel, from Petitioner Daniel C. Frando. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/28/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 9/29/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
September 29, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel C. Frando. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/28/2021 (jms)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Motion to Proceed IFP, from Petitioner Daniel C. Frando. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Civil filing fee paid, receipt number CAS131893. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/28/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/29/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 9/15/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(zda)
September 13, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel C. Frando. NUNC PRO TUNC 9/2/21. (jmo)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford Accepting Document: Motion for Request of Appointment of Counsel, from Petitioner Daniel C. Frando. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/2/21. Signed by Chambers of Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 9/13/21.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
August 25, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia on behalf of Bill Gore (Chenelia, Kristen)Attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia added to party Bill Gore(pty:res) (jms).
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Requiring Response to Petition (28 U.S.C. 2254). Respondent must file a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases no later than 10/19/2021. If Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioner's claims, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition, and a memorandum of points and authorities in support of such answer, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases no later than 10/19/2021. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than 10/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 8/13/2021. (A copy of the Petition and a copy of this Order was served on the Attorney General for the State of California)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
August 11, 2021 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Bill Gore, Xavier Becerra, filed by Daniel C. Frando. (Filing fee $5.00 - receipt number CAS131893) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1434-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frando v. Gore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel C. Frando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bill Gore
Represented By: Attorney General
Represented By: Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Becerra
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?