Feldman v. Amazon Incorporated et al
| Robert Feldman, Jr. |
| Amazon Incorporated and JP Morgan-Chase N.A. |
| 3:2021cv01457 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted thirty days leave to pay the filing fee required to maintain this action, or to submit additional documentation regarding his economic status in accordance with the requirements of CivLR 3.2. If Plaintiff chooses to file additional information regarding his poverty, he must attach a copy of this order. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/30/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(zda)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Feldman, Jr. (ekb) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon Incorporated, JP Morgan-Chase N.A., IFP Filed, filed by Robert Feldman, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1457-DMS-WVG. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Feldman, Robert Jr.)(ekb) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
