Gonzalez v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff: Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 3:2021cv01558
Filed: September 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Referring Judge: Todd W Robinson
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1355
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, but DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #5 ); denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint curing the pleading defects identified in this Order. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 10/21/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(fth)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REQUEST For Appointment of Counsel by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/21/2021. (sxa)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Todd W. Robinson Accepting Document: Request for Appointment of Counsel, from Plaintiff Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/21/21. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sxa)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. (sxa)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against U.S. Customs and Border Protection, filed by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. (sxa)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Denying #2 Without Prejudice Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,and (2) Denying #3 Without Prejudice Motion For Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 9/13/21. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sxa)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. (smd) (sjt).
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. (smd) (sjt).
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against U.S. Customs and Border Protection, IFP Filed, filed by Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1558-TWR-DEB. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Gonzalez, Andres)(smd) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?