Estrada v. Garza et al
| Bryan Estrada |
| Claudia Garza, Miguel Garza, Vladislav Drozdov, Reba Food's, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2021cv01572 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Estrada. Reba Food's, Inc. served. (Cornell, Ross) (anh). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Estrada. Claudia Garza served. (Cornell, Ross) (anh). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Estrada. Miguel Garza served. (Cornell, Ross) (anh). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Estrada. Vladislav Drozdov served. (Cornell, Ross) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10, Vladislav Drozdov, Claudia Garza, Miguel Garza, Reba Food's, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16100411.), filed by Bryan Estrada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1572-CAB-JLB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Cornell, Ross)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
