Herrera v. General Atomics et al
| Ernesto Herrera |
| General Atomics, Carlos Roman Diaz de Leon and Does 1 through 50 |
| 3:2021cv01632 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Linda Lopez |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 fm |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Ernesto Herrera (Votra, Elizabeth) (jrm).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez. Joint Discovery Plan due 10/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 9/28/2021.(jrm)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Carlos Roman Diaz de Leon, General Atomics.(Danzig, Micha)(jrm).
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Atomics. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (rmc)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-16138539.), filed by General Atomics, Carlos Roman Diaz de Leon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1632-AJB-LL. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.(rmc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
