Le v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Tania Le
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 50
Case Number: 3:2021cv01664
Filed: September 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Referring Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER Regulating Discovery and Other Pretrial Proceedings. Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 6/3/2022 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/14/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Thomas J. Whelan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 11/18/2021.(jrm)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ENTRY (AGS): On November 18, 2021, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference. The case did not settle. A scheduling order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. (no document attached) (rfb)
October 26, 2021 Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Ridgeway, Christopher) (jrm).
September 28, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Ridgeway on behalf of Tania Le (Ridgeway, Christopher)Attorney Christopher M. Ridgeway added to party Tania Le(pty:pla) (jrm).
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation and (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2021 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Joint Discovery Plan due 11/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 9/23/2021.(jrm)
September 23, 2021 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Holtz, James) (jrm).
September 22, 2021 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (jms)
September 22, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $402 - receipt number ACASDC-16156021), filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1664-W-AGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(jms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Le v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tania Le
Represented By: David T. Achord
Represented By: Christopher M. Ridgeway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
Represented By: James F Holtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?