Kakowski v. Allison et al
| Brian Kakowski |
| Kathleen Allison, Marcus Pollard, Dr. Clayton, M. Glynn and S. Gates |
| 3:2021cv01675 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Plaintiffs Notice re Proper Identification & Order of Exhibits by Brian Kakowski. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2021(jms)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting Document: Plaintiffs Notice re Proper Identification & Order of Exhibits, from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, OTHER: Motion for IFP [ECF No. 2] remains pending; Complaint submitted for initial screening per 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) & 1915A. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 11/17/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 12
Exhibit H in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] by Brian Kakowski. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2021(jms)
|
|
Filing 11
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting Document: Exhibit H in Support of Complaint [ECF No. 1], from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: CivLR 5.1(e): [E]xhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong.. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 11/16/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 10
Exhibit H in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] by Brian Kakowski. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/15/2021 (jms)
|
|
Filing 9
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting Document: Exhibit H in Support of Complaint [ECF No. 1], from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s) CivLR 5.1(e): [E]xhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/15/2021. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/18/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE to the Courts by Brian Kakowski. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/13/2021 (jms)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting Document: Notice to the Courts, from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, OTHER: Civ.L. Rule 15.1(a) Amended pleadings must be complete by themselves. OTHER: Motion to Proceed IFP [ECF No. 2] remains pending and Complaint [ECF No. 1] has been submitted for initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) & 1915A. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/13/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 10/14/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 6
Exhibit F in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] by Brian Kakowski. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/5/2021(jms)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting Document: Exhibit F in Support of Complaint [ECF No. 1], from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s) CivLR 5.1(e): [E]xhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong.. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/5/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 10/7/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (jms)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Accepting #1 Complaint,, from Plaintiff Brian Kakowski. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, and are not accompanied by a properly supported Motion to Exceed page limitations or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A; and Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by the Chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 9/23/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Kakowski.(jms)(jrd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Kathleen Allison, Marcus Pollard, Clayton, M. Glynn, S. Gates, filed by Brian Kakowski. ($402.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Document Mailed Separately)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1675-JAH-RBM. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2021: #3 Supplement Document Mailed Separately -2) (jms)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
