McPherson v. Allison et al
Barry Robert McPherson |
Kathleen Allison, Marcus Pollard and Does 1 to 100 |
3:2021cv01818 |
October 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Motion For Status of Case and Denying Request For Ruling on Penal Code Interpretations. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/9/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; copy of the Court's docket provided to Plaintiff )(sxa) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Status of Case by Barry Robert McPherson. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/6/2021(jms) |
Filing 7 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz Accepting Document: Motion for Status of Case, from Plaintiff Barry Robert McPherson. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, OTHER: Case closed. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/6/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/9/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) |
Filing 6 ORDER: (1) Granting #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. and (2) Dismissing Civil Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/8/21. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Copy of form Complaint under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 Provided to Plaintiff)(sxa) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (jms) |
Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz Accepting #1 Complaint, from Plaintiff Barry Robert McPherson. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/26/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (jms) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barry Robert McPherson. (jms) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kathleen Allison, Does 1 to 100, Marcus Pollard, filed by Barry Robert McPherson.($402 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1818-BTM-DEB. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.