Agorus, Inc. v. Agora Systems Inc.
Agorus, Inc. |
Agora Systems Inc. |
3:2021cv01922 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Linda Lopez |
Todd W Robinson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 4, 2022. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 1/3/2022. (fth) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable Linda Lopez to the calendar of the Honorable Daniel E. Butcher for all further proceedings. All conference or hearing dates currently set before Magistrate Judge Lopez remain as scheduled before Magistrate Judge Butcher. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 21cv1922 TWR (DEB).(no document attached) (jcj) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Second Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Agora Systems Inc.. (Liddiard, Dylan) (fth). |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Agora Systems Inc. answer due 1/5/2022. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 11/30/2021. (fth) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Agora Systems Inc.. (Liddiard, Dylan)Attorney Dylan J. Liddiard added to party Agora Systems Inc.(pty:dft) (fth). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Agorus, Inc.. Agora Systems Inc. served. (Dillard, David) (fth). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Agorus, Inc.. Agora Systems Inc. served. (Dillard, David) (fth). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jms) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *6,132,039*, *5,946,390* cc:USPTO (jms) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Agora Systems Inc. (Filing fee $402 - Receipt number ACASDC-16315243), filed by Agorus, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-E)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1922-TWR-LL. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Dillard, David)(jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Agorus, Inc. v. Agora Systems Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Agorus, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David A. Dillard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Agora Systems Inc. | |
Represented By: | Dylan J. Liddiard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.