Wentworth et al v. Rivas
Dawn Wentworth and Yaw Appiah-Wentworth |
Dia Rivas and Diana Rivas |
3:2021cv01931 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Bernard G Skomal |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSOLIDATION ORDER. Per Order #4 Cases Consolidated: 21CV1927-BAS-AGS, 21CV1928-BAS-AGS, 21CV1929-BAS-AGS, 21CV1930-BAS-AGS, 21CV1931-BAS-AGS, 21CV1932-BAS-AGS. All future docketing will be done in the lead case 21CV1926-BAS-AGS. (no document attached) (jpp) |
Filing 4 ORDER: (1) Consolidating case; (2) Granting #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (3) Denying #3 motion to appoint counsel. All future filings will be in the lead case 21CV1926-BAS-AGS. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 12/06/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Yaw Appiah-Wentworth, Dawn Wentworth. (jms)(jrd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yaw Appiah-Wentworth, Dawn Wentworth. (jms)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Diana Rivas, IFP Filed, filed by Dawn Wentworth, Yaw Appiah-Wentworth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1931-BAS-BGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.