Graham v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Amanda Graham
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 25
Case Number: 3:2021cv01933
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P Curiel
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 bc
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2022 Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Holtz, Natalie)
January 10, 2022 Filing 8 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Costco Wholesale Corporation (Holtz, Natalie) (dlg).
December 21, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Costco Wholesale Corporation . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Holtz, James) (dlg).
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Following Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Setting Rule 26 Compliance; and Notice of Case Management Conference Via Videoconference. Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2022 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 12/15/21.(dlg)
December 15, 2021 Filing 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 12/15/2021. Case did not settle. Order to issue. (Plaintiff Attorney Elliot Jung). (Defendant Attorney James Holtz). (no document attached) (tww)
November 17, 2021 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Holtz, James) (dlg).
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 12/15/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 11/16/21.(dlg)
November 15, 2021 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (smy1)
November 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16317852.), filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Ct Complaint and State Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1933-GPC-NLS. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(smy1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Graham
Represented By: Elliott H. Jung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
Represented By: James F Holtz
Represented By: Natalie Holtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?