Leave It Leash LLC v. Tail Chasers LLC et al
Leave it Leash LLC |
Tail Chasers LLC, Elizabeth Cooke, Katherine Cooke, Does 1-25 and Kerry Elizabeth Cooke |
3:2021cv01976 |
November 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Karen S Crawford |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Exhibit List TO THE COMPLAINT by Leave It Leash LLC. (Plager, Mark) **QC Mailer re: document not captioned and should have been attached to complaint(jmo). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (dsn) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Leave It Leash LLC. No Parties With Financial Interest. (ggv) (dsn) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *11,076,579*, *10,231,434* cc:USPTO (ggv) (dsn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16341889.), filed by Leave It Leash LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1976-BAS-KSC. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Plager, Mark)(ggv) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.