Tavakoli Leylan v. Garland et al
| Laleh Tavakoli Leylab and Laleh Tavakoli Leylan |
| Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and Christopher A. Wray |
| 3:2021cv01994 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons (Amended) Reissued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Christopher A. Wray. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axc)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16355901.), filed by Laleh Tavakoli Leylab. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-01994-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Anderson, Lisa)(axc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
