Johnson v. Digital Media Solutions
| Aaron L. Johnson |
| Digital Media Solutions |
| 3:2021cv02040 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Continue. Good cause appearing, the parties' Joint Motion to continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) and Case Management Conference (CMC) is GRANTED. The ENE and CMC are hereby continued to April 12, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. The parties must lodge their respective confidential ENE statements and provide the information required by paragraph 4 of the ENE Order [Doc. No. 5] no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 5, 2022. The parties are advised that the ENE/CMC will not be continued further. (Case Management Conference set for 4/12/2022 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 4/12/2022 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 3/14/22. (no document attached) (src)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Continue ENE Conference by Digital Media Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ramsey)(Ramsey, Jay) (axc). |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Kent, Trinette) (anh). |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE AND ORDER for Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/8/2022.(anh)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Digital Media Solutions.(Ramsey, Jay)Attorney Jay T Ramsey added to party Digital Media Solutions(pty:dft) (anh). |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Aaron L. Johnson, as to Digital Media Solutions. (Kent, Trinette) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16378919.), filed by Aaron L. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2040-CAB-KSC. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Trinette G. Kent)(smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Digital Media Solutions | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aaron L. Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Trinette G. Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Digital Media Solutions | |
| Represented By: | Jay T Ramsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
