Howerton v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company et al
| Wilfred Howerton |
| Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Does 1-20 |
| 3:2021cv02045 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (smy1) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Indian Harbor Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent XL Specialty Insurance Company, Other Affiliate XL Group Ltd, Other Affiliate XL Reinsurance America, Inc., Other Affiliate X.L. America, Inc., Other Affiliate XL Financial Holdings (Ireland) Limited, Other Affiliate XL Bermuda Ltd, Other Affiliate EXEL Holdings Limited, Other Affiliate XLIT Ltd., Other Affiliate AXA SA for Indian Harbor Insurance Company.. (Schulte, Yvonne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16385804.), filed by Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Ct Complaint, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Declaration)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2045-W-DEB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.(smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.