Hibert v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
Meghan Hibert |
Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Does 1 through 10 |
3:2021cv02056 |
December 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Ruben B Brooks |
Thomas J Whelan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management And Early Neutral Evaluation Conference by Meghan Hibert. (Friedman, Todd) (jrm). |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John Andrew Kelly on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Kelly, John)(jrm). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Midland Credit Management, Inc. . Identifying Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group, Inc. for Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Landers, Thomas)(jrm). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Midland Credit Management, Inc. (smy1)(jrd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16390050.), filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Ct Complaint, #3 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2056-W-RBB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(smy1)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.