Vertical Bridge Development, LLC v. Calexico City Council et al
| Vertical Bridge Development, LLC |
| Calexico City Council, The City of Calexico, California and Does 1 to 5 |
| 3:2021cv02097 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| M James Lorenz |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
On January 18, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF 6. On February 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. ECF 10. The Court therefore DENIES the motion to dismiss as moot. Defendants have until the time set forth under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 to respond to the amended complaint. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/8/2022. (no document attached) (jtz)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jpp)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Vertical Bridge Development, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)New Summons Requested. (Webb, Kristin)(jpp).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Christopher M. Blaesing, re #8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/26/2022.(rmc)
|
|
Filing 8
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Blaesing, Christopher) (rmc).
|
|
Filing 7
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16507759.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Blaesing, Christopher) QC mail sent re missing signature (rmc).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by The City of Calexico, California. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 2 to Request for Judicial Notice)(Rutschman, Avi)Attorney Avi William Rutschman added to party The City of Calexico, California(pty:dft) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro for all further magistrate proceedings. The new case number is 21cv2097-L-RBM.(no document attached) (dlg)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Aileen M. Hunter on behalf of Vertical Bridge Development, LLC (Hunter, Aileen)Attorney Aileen M. Hunter added to party Vertical Bridge Development, LLC(pty:pla) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vertical Bridge Development, LLC. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Webb, Kristin) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Calexico City Council, Does 1 to 5, The City of Calexico, California ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BCASDC-16415101.), filed by Vertical Bridge Development, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2097-L-DEB. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Webb, Kristin)(axc) (rmc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
