Little Miss Party Planner, LLC v. Marengo et al
Little Miss Party Planner, LLC |
Natalie Marengo, Natalie Gartner, Natalie Rose, Little Miss Party Planner LLC and Does 1-10 |
3:2021cv02139 |
December 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Bernard G Skomal |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Little Miss Party Planner, LLC. Little Miss Party Planner LLC served. (Kowsari, Michael) (anh). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Little Miss Party Planner, LLC. Natalie Marengo served. (Kowsari, Michael) (anh). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smy1)(jrd) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *4,185,442* (cc: USPTO)(smy1)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Natalie Marengo, Little Miss Party Planner LLC, Does 1-10 (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16436363.), filed by Little Miss Party Planner, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2139-CAB-BGS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Kowsari, Michael)(smy1)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.