Ceballos v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC et al
Maria D. Ceballos |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC and Equifax Information Services LLC |
3:2021cv02148 |
December 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Bernard G Skomal |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Joint Motion for Defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC to respond to Complaint to on or before 3/4/2022. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 2/04/2022. (jpp) |
Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC. (Im, Robert)Attorney Robert June-Yong Im added to party Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC(pty:dft) (jpp). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smy1)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16440409.), filed by Maria D. Ceballos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-2148-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Ovruchesky, Clark)(smy1)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.