Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al
| Michael J. Aguirre |
| United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Does 1 to 10 |
| 3:2022cv00080 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| John A Houston |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Ethics in Government Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael J. Aguirre. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission served. (Severson, Maria) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks recuses from this case and is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major for all further Magistrate Judge proceedings. The new case number is 22cv0080-JAH(BLM).(no document attached) (jsp)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dsn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16497001.), filed by Michael J. Aguirre. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-80-JAH-RBB. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Severson, Maria)(dsn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
