Ahmed et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
| Awaz Ahmed and Amin Abdulrazak |
| Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00142 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (zda)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Entry of Clerk Default against Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy R. Rotman)(Rotman, Amy) (zda).
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Awaz Ahmed, Amin Abdulrazak. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC served. (Wirtz, Richard) (ddf).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ave) (rmc).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16529767.), filed by Awaz Ahmed, Amin Abdulrazak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-142-DMS-WVG. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Wirtz, Richard)(ave) (rmc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
