Grosner v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. et al
| Michael A Grosner |
| Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2022cv00157 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael A Grosner. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company served. (Tower, John) (jms). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael A Grosner. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. served. (Tower, John) (jms). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ave) (rmc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Does 1 through 10 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16536479.), filed by Michael A Grosner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-157-LAB-AHG. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Tower, John)(ave) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
