Walsh v. Atlas Freight Forwarding, Inc. et al
Martin J. Walsh |
Atlas Freight Forwarding, Inc., Coordinadora De Servicios Aduanales Atlas, S.C. and Ignacio Manuel Garcia Rios |
3:2022cv00216 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Andrew G Schopler |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0206 FLSA: Minimum Wage |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Martin J. Walsh against Atlas Freight Forwarding, Inc., Coordinadora De Servicios Aduanales Atlas, S.C., Ignacio Manuel Garcia Rios. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 2/23/2022.(jrm) |
Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Judgment)(Ahumada, Adriana) (jrm). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smy1)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Atlas Freight Forwarding, Inc., Coordinadora De Servicios Aduanales Atlas, S.C., Ignacio Manuel Garcia Rios (Filing fee waived.), filed by Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:22-cv-216-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Ahumada, Adriana)(smy1)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.