Hill v. Lynch et al
| Cymeyon V. Hill |
| Jeff Lynch, Sergeant Gonzalez, Sergeant Baker and Captain Conrad |
| 3:2022cv00397 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Eastern District of California. Case number in other court is 2:22-cv-00686 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Eastern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *United States District Court, Eastern District of California*.*501 I Street, Room 4-200**Sacramento, CA 95814-7300*. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cymeyonv Hill. (smy1) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Baker, Gonzalez, Jeff Lynch (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Cymeyonv Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-397-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
