Mickelson v. City of Encinitas
Plaintiff: James Mickelson
Defendant: City of Encinitas
Case Number: 3:2022cv00487
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 021
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by James Mickelson and City of Encinitas (Cunningham, James) (jmo).
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Granting Joint Motion to Continue June 1, 2022, Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (ECF No. #7 ). Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 6/1/22 continued to 6/8/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 5/12/22. (jmo)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference by James Mickelson. (Cunningham, James) (jmo).
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice and Order for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 6/1/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major. Case Management Conference set for 6/1/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major. Joint Discovery Plan due 5/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 4/27/22.(jmo)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City of Encinitas.(Burns, Gena)Attorney Gena Bliss Burns added to party City of Encinitas(pty:dft) (jmo).
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by James Mickelson. Amendment to #1 Complaint, Consent to Join Action. (Cunningham, James) (jmo).
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Consent to Join Action by James Mickelson re #1 Complaint, (Cunningham, James) **QC mailer re: add plaintiffs to a complaint either via motion and/or via amended complaint. Modified on 4/11/2022 (jmo).
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against City of Encinitas (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16724319.), filed by James Mickelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-487-BAS-BLM. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Cunningham, James) (fth)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mickelson v. City of Encinitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Mickelson
Represented By: James Joseph Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Encinitas
Represented By: Gena Bliss Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?