Toussaint v. All Points Realty et al
Fritz Gerald Toussaint |
All Points Realty, Patricia Kaversian and Debbie Cook |
3:2022cv00496 |
April 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Larry Alan Burns |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor filed a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Case is closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth) |
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/1/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #7 Order. Mail sent to Fritz Gerald Toussaint. (bta) Document mailed again on 5/4/2022 (jms). |
Filing 7 ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Without Prejudice #2 . Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/25/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) |
Filing 6 Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt assigned to transfer case from Eastern District of New York. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (jpp) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New York Eastern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01010. Original file received electronically |
Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, this action is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. 84, 1406(a). The decision on Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, see ECF No. 2, is reserved for the transferee court. The provision of Rule 83.1 requiring a seven-day delay between a transfer order and the effectuation of the transfer is waived. Summonses shall not issue from this Court and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 4/8/2022. (Almonte, Kelly) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/12/2022.] |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/12/2022.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fritz Gerald Toussaint. (Neptune, Pierre) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/12/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Fritz Gerald Toussaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Neptune, Pierre) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.