Mendoza v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
| Jose Mendoza |
| Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, TransUnion LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00502 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Mendoza. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC served. (Charity, Garrett) (jpp). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Mendoza. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served. (Charity, Garrett) (jpp). |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jose Mendoza, as to TransUnion LLC. (Charity, Garrett) (jpp). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxt)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, TransUnion LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16732754.), filed by Jose Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-502-DMS-MSB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Charity, Garrett)(cxt)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
