BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. v. The United States of America
| BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. |
| The United States of America |
| 3:2022cv00515 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| M James Lorenz |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.. The United States of America served. (Katsell, Noah) (fth). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.. The United States of America served. (Katsell, Noah) (fth). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.. The United States of America served. (Katsell, Noah) (fth). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.. The United States of America served. (Katsell, Noah) (fth). |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge John A. Houston is no longer assigned. Case randomly reassigned to Judge M. James Lorenz for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22-cv-00515-L-BGS.(no document attached) (cxt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxt) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. identifying Corporate Parent BAE Systems Holdings Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Corporate Parent BAE Systems (Holdings) ltd., a UK Company, Corporate Parent BAE Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Corporate Parent BAE SYSTEMS plc, a UK company, Corporate Parent BAE Systems Ship Repair Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Corporate Parent BAE Systems Land & Armaments Inc., a Delaware Corporation for BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.. (cxt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against The United States of America (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16738012.), filed by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Decatur Contract, #3 Exhibit 2 - Stethem Contract, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement)The new case number is 3:22-cv-515-JAH-BGS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Katsell, Noah)(cxt)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. v. The United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Noah A Katsell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States of America | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
