Muro v. Gipson et al
| Antonio Muro |
| Connie Gipson and Rob Bonto |
| 3:2022cv00550 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Linda Lopez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance re #2 Order Dismissing Case, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Antonio Muro. (smy1) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 Order Dismissing Case. Mail sent to Anthony Contreras. (bta) |
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice and Notice of Options Due to Failure to Exhaust State Court Remedies. Signed by Judge Linda Lopez on 4/25/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(axc) Copy of Order Resent to Plaintiff on 5/20/2022 after address was corrected on Initial Copy sent (smy1).
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Rob Bonto, Connie Gipson (Filing fee $5, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Antonio Muro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachments 1 to 4)The new case number is 3:22-cv-550-LL-JLB. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(smy1) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
