Pierce v. UNUM Group et al
| Jessica Pierce |
| UNUM Group and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2022cv00554 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 sh Removal-Sexual Harassment |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 8/3/2022 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Joint Discovery Plan due 7/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 5/10/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by UNUM Group. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16760310.), filed by UNUM Group. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Removal-HR Declaration, #7 POS re Removal)The new case number is 3:22-cv-554-AJB-BGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(ggv) (sjt). (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/22/2022) (ggv). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2022: #8 Declaration Declaration of Adrienne L. Conrad) (ggv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
