Haro v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. et al
| Martha Haro |
| Jeld-Wen, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
| 3:2022cv00592 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Marilyn L Huff |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 5/13/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Jeld-Wen, Inc. No Parties With Financial Interest. (cxt)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Jeld-Wen, Inc. (cxt)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16776000.), filed by Jeld-Wen, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Declaration of Juliet Pate, #7 Declaration of Tracie Childs, #8 Notice of Interested Parties, #9 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:22-cv-592-H-BGS. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(cxt)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
