Knight v. Accutrace, Inc. et al
Tiffany Knight |
Accutrace, Inc. and Clearstar, Inc. |
3:2022cv00685 |
May 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William V Gallo |
William Q Hayes |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Clearstar, Inc..(Berke, David) (ave). |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Clearstar, Inc. answer due 6/23/2022.. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/9/2022. (ave) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Clearstar, Inc.. (Berke, David)Attorney David M. Berke added to party Clearstar, Inc.(pty:dft)(ave). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Babak Semnar on behalf of Tiffany Knight (Semnar, Babak) (ave). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mef)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Accutrace, Inc., Clearstar, Inc. (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16823433.)filed by Tiffany Knight. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-685-WQH-WVG. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Hartman, Jared)(mef)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.