United States of America for the use and benefit of ideal Manufacturing, Inc. v. West Point Contractors, Inc., et al
| United States of America |
| West Point Contractors, Inc., West Point Utilities, LLC, Harco National Insurance Company, First Mark Construction, LLC doing business as First Mark Foundations and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland |
| 3:2022cv00732 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1352 Miller Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, First Mark Construction, LLC, Harco National Insurance Company, West Point Contractors, Inc., West Point Utilities, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16843242.), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-732-BAS-JLB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Osborne, Michael)(ggv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
