Divar et al v. United States Department of State et al
| Masoumeh Divar and Shayan Fazli |
| United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, Antony Blinken and Jeffrey L. Flake |
| 3:2022cv00759 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Michael S Berg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Masoumeh Divar, Shayan Fazli. Antony Blinken, Jeffrey L. Flake, U.S. Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, United States Department of State served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipts)(Sullivan, Christina) (tcf). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxt)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, Antony Blinken, Jeffrey L. Flake (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16858867.), filed by Masoumeh Divar, Shayan Fazli. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-759-MMA-MSB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Christina Sullivan)(cxt)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
