Urmancheev v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Health Services Corps et al
| A.S. Urmancheev |
| Immigration and Customs Enforcement Health Services Corps and United States Government |
| 3:2022cv00762 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Michael S Berg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Mail sent to A. S. Urmancheev. (bta) |
Filing 3
ORDER: (1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and (2) Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/16/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (Main Document 3 replaced on 6/17/2022) (anh).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by A.S. Urmancheev. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Immigration and Customs Enforcement Health Services Corps, United States Government (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by A.S. Urmancheev. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-762-CAB-MSB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
