Price v. Hartley et al
| Marcel D. Price |
| James D. Hartley, Merrick Garland and Sean Moore |
| 3:2022cv00775 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Merrick Garland, Sean Moore, filed by Marcel D. Price. (Attachments: #1 Notice Motion to Accept Amended Petition) (smy1)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice and With Leave to Amend. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must, no later than 8/8/22, file a First Amended Petition that cures the pleading deficiencies set forth above. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/2/22.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service with order and blank first amended petition)(jmo)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Merrick Garland, James D. Hartley ( Filing fee $5, fee paid, receipt number CAS138211.), filed by Marcel D. Price. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-775-GPC-KSC. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(smy1)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
