Smith v. Lavey et al
Plaintiff: Damon Smith
Defendant: Robert Lavey and Does 1-100
Case Number: 3:2022cv00777
Filed: May 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: William V Gallo
Referring Judge: Ruth Bermudez Montenegro
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by James P. McDonald on behalf of Robert Lavey (McDonald, James)Attorney James P. McDonald added to party Robert Lavey(pty:dft) (jpp).
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE AND ORDER for (1) Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Case Management Conference and (3) Telephonic Status Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 9/29/2022 at 2:00pm. Telephonic Status Conference set for 9/15/2022 at 2:00pm. Joint Discovery Plan due 8/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 7/07/2022.(jpp) (Main Document 8 replaced on 7/8/2022) (djk).
June 28, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Robert Lavey.(Garchie, Peter)Attorney Peter L. Garchie added to party Robert Lavey(pty:dft) (jpp).
June 13, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Damon Smith. Robert Lavey served. (Leary, Thomas) (ddf).
June 13, 2022 Filing 5 PRO HAC APPROVED: Richard A. Dillenburg appearing for Plaintiff Damon Smith (no document attached) (rmc)
June 13, 2022 Filing 4 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16908035.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Dillenburg, Richard) (rmc).
June 13, 2022 Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Dillenburg, Richard) QC mail sent re missing fee (rmc).
June 1, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mef)
May 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Robert Lavey, Does 1-100 (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16864695.) filed by Damon Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-777-RBM-WVG. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Leary, Thomas)(mef)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Lavey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damon Smith
Represented By: Thomas Anthony Leary
Represented By: Richard A. Dillenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Lavey
Represented By: Peter L. Garchie
Represented By: James P. McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?