Walker et al v. SSA et al
| Terry James Walker, Annette Walker and Davis Bros. Lumber Co. |
| SSA, State Of Gainv and LA Muscogee County |
| 3:2022cv00860 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Robert S Huie |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Other Fraud |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge Robert S. Huie for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22CV0860-RSH-KSC. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/24/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davis Bros. Lumber Co., Annette Walker, Terry James Walker. (alns)(jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against LA Muscogee County, SSA, State Of Gainv, IFP Filed, filed by Terry James Walker, Davis Bros. Lumber Co., Annette Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-860-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Walker, Annette)(alns) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
