Lopez v. Hill et al
| Henry Elvis Lopez |
| James Hill and Rob Bonta |
| 3:2022cv00888 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon L Rhodes on behalf of James Hill (Rhodes, Sharon)Attorney Sharon L Rhodes added to party James Hill(pty:res) (smy1). |
Filing 2
ORDER requiring response to Petition (28 USC 2254) and setting briefing schedule. Motion to Dismiss Deadline 9/23/2022. Opposition Motion to Dismiss due 10/24/2022. Answer by Respondent due 9/23/2022. Traverse by Petitioner due 10/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 07/18/2022.(jpp)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Rob Bonta, James Hill ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-16923173.), filed by Henry Elvis Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:22-cv-888-RBM-KSC. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Sevilla, Charles)(smy1) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
