Haskin v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
| Lorin Dean Haskin |
| U.S. Bank N.A. doing business as U.S. Bank, U.S. Bankcorp and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2022cv00924 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp identifying Corporate Parent U.S. Bancorp for U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp.. (mef) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp. Identifying Other Affiliate U.S. Bancorp, Other Affiliate U.S. Bank National Association for U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp. (mef) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp. (mef) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16936803.)filed by U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bankcorp, Does 1-10. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Notice notice of related case, #6 Declaration Declaration of Attorney)The new case number is 3:22-cv-924-BEN-AGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(mef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
