Burgos v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: George Burgos
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2022cv00943
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Battaglia
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Dismissal. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/10/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
January 10, 2023 Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by George Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Kevin)
January 10, 2023 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by George Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Kevin)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER (AGS): On January 4, 2023, the parties were required to jointly call this Court to "provide an oral status report as to filing of the joint motion to dismiss." (See ECF 10.) They didn't. So, on January 20, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., the parties must jointly call the Court to provide that joint status report. By that same date, the parties must also show cause in writing, limited to three pages, why they should not be held in contempt of Court for ignoring the Court's earlier order. Should the joint motion to dismiss be filed prior to January 20, 2023, both the obligation to call and the requirement to show cause will be vacated without further Court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 01/06/2023. (no document attached) (mxa)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER (AGS): On January 4, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., the parties must jointly call Judge Schopler's chambers to provide an oral status report as to filing of the joint motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating that joint call to chambers. Should the joint motion to dismiss be filed before that time, the obligation to call will be stricken without further Court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 10/11/2022.(no document attached) (mxa)
October 3, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by George Burgos (Jacobson, Kevin) (jrm).
August 23, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE ENTRY (AGS): On August 23, 2022, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation. The case settled. The parties must meet and confer on the issue of attorneys' fees. If the parties are not able to agree on an appropriate number, they must file a motion for judicial determination of fees by September 30, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 08/23/2022. (CD# 8/23/2022 AGS 10:40-10:47). (no document attached) (mxa)
August 15, 2022 Filing 7 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by George Burgos (Jacobson, Kevin) (jrm).
July 29, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Declination to a Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company (Vanderhoof, Brian)(jrm).
July 29, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lodgment by Ford Motor Company Notice of Lodging Answer of Defendant Ford Motor Company to Plaintiff's Unverified Complaint (Won, Jonathan)(jrm).
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice and Order: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation and (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2022 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Joint Discovery Plan due 8/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/28/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
June 27, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest by Ford Motor Company. Identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate State Street Bank and Trust Company for Ford Motor Company. (ggv) (sjt).
June 27, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company. (ggv) (sjt).
June 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16946647.), filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Declaration of Brian C. Vanderhoof, #4 Declaration of Jonathan Won)The new case number is 3:22-cv-943-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(ggv) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgos v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Burgos
Represented By: Allen Amarkarian
Represented By: Kevin Y. Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Brian Curtis Vanderhoof
Represented By: Jonathan Won
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?