Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney General et al
Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota |
Utah Attorney General and Hon. Judge Fonnesbeck |
3:2022cv00978 |
July 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Karen S Crawford |
Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
Dana M Sabraw |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by Hon. Judge Fonnesbeck, Utah Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Respond)(Geary, Stephen)Attorney Stephen W. Geary added to party Hon. Judge Fonnesbeck(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen W. Geary added to party Utah Attorney General (pty:dft) (jpp). |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Documents by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. (jpp) |
|
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (exs) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Hon. Judge Fonnesbeck, Utah Attorney General ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CAS138966.), filed by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 1, #3 A, #4 B, #5 Filling Fee Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-978-DMS-DEB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota)(exs) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.