Thomas v. Agular et al
Plaintiff: William H. Thomas
Defendant: Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Case Number: 3:2022cv00979
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Referring Judge: Robert S Huie
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order: Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 ; Dismissing All Defendants Except Agular And John Doe 2 Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B) & 1915a(B); And Granting Plaintiff Leave To Amend His Complaint #1 Or Proceed As To Defendants Agular And John Doe 2 Only - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 8/12/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ave)
June 30, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William H. Thomas. (smy1)
June 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by William H. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-979-RSH-DEB. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Agular et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William H. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Agular
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?