Flores v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Edward R Flores
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 3:2022cv01047
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Filing 12 SERVICE of Process (USM 285) by Edward R Flores as to Kilolo Kijakazi (Office of Attorney General) (axc)
August 24, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) (exs).
August 24, 2022 Filing 10 SERVICE of Process (USM 285) by Edward R Flores as to Kilolo Kijakazi (Office if the Regional Counsel) (axc)
August 19, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) (axc).
August 18, 2022 Filing 9 SERVICE OF PROCESS (USM285) as to Kilolo Kijakazi (United States Attorney's Office) served on August 17, 2022. (axc)
July 25, 2022 Filing 7 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Edward R Flores. (mef)(jrd)
July 22, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(axc)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #3 ] US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 7/22/2022. (IFP Packet Prepared) (axc)
July 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Bernard G. Skomal has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (cxl1) (sjt).
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward R Flores. (cxl1) (sjt).
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Edward R Flores. No Parties With Financial Interest. (cxl1) (sjt).
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, IFP Filed Filed by Edward R Flores. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1047-BGS. Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal is assigned to the case. (Holmberg, Matthew)(cxl1)(sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward R Flores
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Holmberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Katherine L. Parker
Represented By: Sharon Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?