Woods v. Health Care Specialty Services et al
Plaintiff: Michael Phillip Woods
Defendant: Health Care Specialty Services and Centinela State Prison
Case Number: 3:2022cv01055
Filed: July 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Centinela State Prison - Trust Office. (smy1)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #3 by Michael Phillip Woods. (smy1)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Centinela State Prison, Health Care Specialty Services, filed by Michael Phillip Woods. **E-filed in Compliance with GO653A #2 ** (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) [Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1).
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Centinela State Prison - Trust Office. (smy1)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Rejecting re #1 Complaint, from Plaintiff Michael Phillip Woods. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A;. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties, Original Document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Rejected Docs)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)(jrd)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN per #2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Centinela State Prison, Health Care Specialty Services (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Michael Phillip Woods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1055-MMA-AGS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/21/2022) (smy1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woods v. Health Care Specialty Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Phillip Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Health Care Specialty Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centinela State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?