Faison v. Branstad et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Levi Faison, Jr.
Defendant: Branstad, Andrew Lipman, Brian Thompson and Jimmy White
Case Number: 3:2022cv01063
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Michael S Berg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A without leave to amend and denies Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP as moot. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore could not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) (Main Document 4 replaced and NEF regenerated on 8/23/2022) (tcf).
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Dismissing Civil Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) and Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as Moot. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/23/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Levi Faison, Jr. (smy1)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Branstad, Andrew Lipman, Brian Thompson, Jimmy White (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Matthew Levi Faison, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1063-MMA-MSB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/21/2022: #2 Exhibit) (smy1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faison v. Branstad et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Levi Faison, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Branstad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Lipman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?