Maxwell v. United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista
Plaintiff: Anthony Maxwell Lamar, Jr.
Defendant: United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista
Case Number: 3:2022cv01097
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
2 Judge: William Q Hayes
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution by United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Superior Court Filing, #2 Declaration of Mary Wiggins, #3 Declaration of Kimberly Herbst, #4 Proof of Service)(Cabral, Janet) (anh).
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista answer due 8/26/2022. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/1/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ave)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Michael M. Anello is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge William Q. Hayes for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22CV1097-WQH-MDD.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (alns)
July 28, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge M. James Lorenz is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Anello for all further proceedings. Pending hearings previously set before the original Judge have been transferred to the newly assigned Judge. The new case number is 22cv1097-MMA-MDD.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (fth)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge M. James Lorenz for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22cv1097-L-MDD.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (ddf)
July 27, 2022 Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION for Order Setting Time to Respond to Complaint by United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Cabral, Janet) (tcf).
July 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL, No Fee Required, filed by United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1097-BEN-MDD. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(ggv) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Maxwell Lamar, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service/ Linda Vista
Represented By: Janet A Cabral
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?