Lamotte v. State of California et al
Plaintiff: James Dondi Lamotte
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Holmes and Michael Christensen
Case Number: 3:2022cv01160
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b)(1). The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A and GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/21/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, order mailed to Watch Commander and Plaintiff mailed a court approved civil rights complaint form.) (tcf)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Dondi Lamotte. (smy1)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Christensen, Matthew Holmes, State of California (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by James Dondi Lamotte. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1160-MMA-NLS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lamotte v. State of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Dondi Lamotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?