Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. Zeetogroup, LLC
Digital Media Solutions, LLC |
Zeetogroup, LLC |
3:2022cv01184 |
August 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Allison H Goddard |
Janis L Sammartino |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Response to Plaintiff Digital Media Solutions, LLC's Response to Order to Show Cause as to Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shayne Cardwell)(Gillick, Jacob)(exs). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Digital Media Solutions, LLC re #7 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fernando Borghese)(Shabani, Omid) (tcf). |
Filing 7 ORDER Ordering Plaintiff Digital Media Solutions, LLC to Show Cause as to Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. #1 ). Plaintiff SHALL file a response to this order on or before 9/29/2022. Defendant MAY file a reply to Plaintiff's response on or before 10/6/2022. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/15/2022. (tcf) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Zeetogroup, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Stephan Goss)(Gillick, Jacob) (tcf). |
Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference via Videoconference. An Early Neutral Evaluation is set for 10/27/2022 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard via videoconference. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 9/8/2022. (tcf) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Zeetogroup, LLC.(Gillick, Jacob)Attorney Jacob Asher Gillick added to party Zeetogroup, LLC(pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Digital Media Solutions, LLC. Zeetogroup, LLC served. (Shabani, Omid) (tcf). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (alns) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Zeetogroup, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17074715.), filed by Digital Media Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1184-JLS-AHG. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Shabani, Omid)(alns) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. Zeetogroup, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Digital Media Solutions, LLC | |
Represented By: | Mark E Ellis |
Represented By: | Omid Shabani |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zeetogroup, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jacob Asher Gillick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.