Morones v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Enrique Morones
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 75
Case Number: 3:2022cv01187
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Referring Judge: Gonzalo P Curiel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order Granting Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice re: #9 . Each party shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/14/22. (jmo)
November 10, 2022 Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss All Claims With Prejudice by Ford Motor Company. (Do, Hang) (jmo).
September 21, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER. On September 21, 2022, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. The case settled. (ECF No. 7.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. A Joint Motion for Dismissal shall be electronically filed on or before November 10, 2022. On the same day the Joint Motion for Dismissal is filed, the proposed order for dismissal, for the signature of the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, shall be e-mailed to the chambers of the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel. 2. If a Joint Motion for Dismissal and proposed order for dismissal are not submitted on or before November 10, 2022, then a counsel-only Settlement Disposition Conference (SDC) shall be held by video on November 14, 2022, at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. For purposes of the Conference, the Court shall use its official ZoomGovvideo conferencing account. Prior to the start of the SDC, the Court will email all counsel an invitation to join the Zoom video conference. 3. If a Joint Motion for Dismissal and proposed order for dismissal are received on or before November 10, 2022, the SDC shall be vacated without further court order. Signed by Chambers of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 9/21/22.(jmo)
September 21, 2022 Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 9/21/2022. Case settled. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Gregory T. Babbitt, Jeffrey L. LePere). (Defendant Attorney Hang Thi Alexandra Do). (Enrique Morones, Luis Gomez).(no document attached) (cxe)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: Early Neutral Evaluation ("ENE") statements were due to the Court by 9/12/2022. (ECF No. #4 .) The Court is not in receipt of Plaintiff's confidential ENE statement. Accordingly, no later than 9/16/2022, at 3:00 PM, Plaintiff shall LODGE his confidential ENE statement by emailing it to efile_Burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement shall address why it is being lodged after the Court-ordered deadline. The statement shall comply with paragraph 4 of the Court's order setting the ENE. (ECF No. #4 .) (cxe)
September 12, 2022 Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Ford Motor Company (Do, Hang) (jmo).
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice and Order for Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conferences. Video conference Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management set for 9/21/2022 at 01:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Joint Discovery Plan due 9/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 8/12/22.(jmo)
August 12, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Parties With Financial Interest by Ford Motor Company. Identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc., Other Affiliate State Street Bank and Trust Company for Ford Motor Company. (alns) (jms).
August 12, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company. (alns) (jms).
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17075913.), filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Jury Demand, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Declaration, #5 Declaration, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1187-GPC-JLB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(alns) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morones v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Enrique Morones
Represented By: Hallen D Rosner
Represented By: Jeffrey L. LePere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Hang Thi Alexandra Do
Represented By: Robert A Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 75
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?